1.学理基础

神经技术滥用的最大风险在于意识形态冲突，信仰不包容性，以及极端思想的产生。厚黑可以被视为其中一个法制控制和公开下的儒家思想的表现。中国共产党党章中明确规定的防右更需防左，以及对于改革开放，和谐社会等思想的明确提出，体现了中国共产党基本原则的信仰包容性。

      人类思考依赖自身的独特的历史经验直接得到经验性结果，无法实现框架性和范式完整思维，也就是不能依据人脑神经数据处理新问题和研究型工作，对于复杂问题也无法得到有效结果。

       基于人脑神经数据基础上个体神经计算心理学与群体计算神经心理学的学理区别

人脑是依据经验进行计算的，经验是一个人独一无二的历史，那么每个人的人脑计算逻辑都是独一无二的。也就是说我们只能有个体的计算神经心理学，不可能存在群体的计算神经心理学，也就无法用于社会管理。

真正的计算神经心理学的学理本质是需要揭示以量子论为核心解释信息学与神经学统一关系，进而本质量化解释心理学问题，也就真正的建立了群体计算神经心理学。为社会管理奠定了基础。

法律是道德的最低最可量化最无分歧的标准，也是解决神经技术问题的标准

人脑神经伦理及类脑人工智能伦理的中国研究基础

基本理论基础：宪法+联合国世界人权宣言

道德理论基础：社会主义核心价值观

法律基础：个人信息保护法，生物安全法，科学技术进步法，名誉权保护，知识产权保护法，无线电管制规定，无线电频率划分规定

尊重和敬畏传统和文化，不要轻易试图颠覆和转变，只能像细雨一样慢慢孕育新的植物，直到这些植物融入整个森林，形成新的面貌。

尊重和敬畏传统和文化，不要轻易试图颠覆和转变，只能像细雨一样慢慢孕育新的植物，直到这些植物融入整个森林，形成新的面貌。

在高强度曝光的情况下，注定是少数文化被主流文化吞没，除非有主流文化的权威支持。最佳的方式，就是合理的少数文化隐藏起来，等待风暴的过去。

中国人脑神经伦理法学研究基础：

基本理论基础：宪法+联合国世界人权宣言

法律基础：个人信息保护法，生物安全法，科学技术进步法，名誉权保护，知识产权保护法，无线电管制规定，无线电频率划分规定

关于神经技术问题所需要思考的方式

一个完美的结果，必须同时考虑外部变量（环境）和内部变量（事件本身）,任何思考的不全面都将无法求得这个完美的结果。

大脑的自主能力的重要性及辨识

影响大脑的方式是控制输入和反馈，人的大脑的输入主要依靠听觉和视觉，反馈是人的大脑长时间的独立思考。如果持续给予大脑不间断的输入，那么人的大脑就不会有时间反馈，那么这个大脑主导的行为将没有反馈的越来越大。如果连续的输入是有策略的，那么实质上就形成了对于该人的行为控制。当你无法进行长时间独立思考的时候，那么你就已经被控制了。最总要的视听觉的干扰，在生物学的实质是控制干扰工作记忆和强化工作记忆。

      关于神经技术应用之中出现的第三维世界的管理

      在我们未来的世界很可能出现第三维度，即人工神经世界

      现实世界

      互联网世界

      人工神经世界

      我个人建议不要轻易将三个世界打通，不然的话精神病院将是人工神经世界最好的地方。

      那么我们如何区分他们呢？

      现实世界是一个可以摸得着看得见的物理世界

      互联网世界是需要现实世界提供信用的世界

      人工神经世界是需要现实世界提供证据的世界

关于神经技术用于社交领域的风险

完全基于人脑神经数据放弃人类嘴部语言的交流方式的通讯设备是很难开发的，连接人与人之间的平台必然是通过人类试听输入的设备，但是如何把握人类独立自主思考和对于无效数据的过滤问题，将是一个非常棘手的问题，同时在社会管理学方面会产生第三方平台控制问题（即便是算法的控制），这种情况从根本上来看还是将控制了人类自主独立表达意愿，完整严密思考和表达责任。

从人类学的角度看，放弃嘴部语言其实是放弃了人类进化的结果，人类进化的主要结果是人类大脑的进化和人类手部的进化，而人类大脑的计划为人类高级语言提供了基础，而语言是人类交流的基础，人类交流是构成人类社会的基础；也就是说放弃了语言交流就是相当于人类社会的进化，更有甚者首先破坏了社会最密切交流关系夫妻关系和破坏了社会最基本组成单位家庭，进而瓦解了现有社会的组织结构。那么用神经技术创造文化的过程中，实质上将导致人类社会的瓦解。

对于社交不对称不平等问题，以及由此引起的欺骗、不诚信和管理性奴役性问题，是普遍的显而易见的。

神经技术下的信任成本

虽然理想中的神经技术会最高效给予沟通双方最直接最准确信息传输，但是失去了道德的封装，双方是否能够有效的接受传递信息，以及其中最起码的利己成分。如果仅是单方面的神经技术的应用，最好的情况也就是信息的审核和监督而已，完全没办法建立信任、尊敬和有效的平等交流。

神经技术对于市场经济的影响和控制

市场经济的基础是平等的契约机制和自由的选择；那么对于人脑神经数据所产生的不平等社会关系，以及神经技术控制型商家充分了解市场消费者需求状况所导致的选择多样性消亡问题必须加以限制。最后将直接导致国家掌握国民消费需求，市场经济自由选择的配给高效性和合理性将不复存在，取而代之的是国家直接计划配给，以及长期演化而来的国民需求单一和国际竞争对比失败，长远来看是完全历史倒退。

2.信仰统一性

人脑神经伦理及类脑人工智能伦理主张：马克思主义（社会主义）

在以马克思主义为指导的社会主义国家里，实现共产主义是其最终目标，也就是说实现永远摆脱剥削、压迫；中国的共产党党章认定党的最高理想和最终目标是实现共产主义，同时中国宪法认定国家的一切权力属于人民，也就是说每个人都必须是自由的，不受压迫的。那么从这个角度，思维控制这种绝对的人类剥削压迫是应绝对禁止的。这与美国宪法中的”使我们自己及后代得享受自由之赐福”不谋而合。

人类绝不可能创造出超越自己智商的产品，那么也就是说人工永远不能战胜自然进化的结果。

人脑神经伦理及类脑人工智能伦理主张：基督教

基督教并不反对人拥有自由意志

人们的赎罪和内心的忏悔是需要在神的面前（任何基督徒思想的救赎只能由神来管理）

人类绝不可能创造出超越自己智商的产品，那么更不可能创造出超越或者齐平造物主的鬼东西。

人脑神经伦理及类脑人工智能伦理主张：伊斯兰教

人的灵魂能够被只能够在真主的控制下被读取，只有真主才能有权利奖惩这个灵魂。

人的灵魂能够被只能够在真主的控制下被读取，只有真主才能有权利奖惩这个灵魂。

人类的生命是由神创造的

人类是神创造的，人类绝不可能创造出超越自己智商的产品，那么更不可能创造出超越或者齐平造物主的鬼东西。

人脑神经伦理及类脑人工智能伦理主张：美国宪法和自由意志

美国宪法中的”使我们自己及后代得享受自由之赐福”不谋而合。

人脑神经伦理及类脑人工智能伦理主张：佛教

在原始佛教并不否认灵魂的存在，但现在佛教并不承认灵魂和自我的存在，取而代之采用“无我”进行解释。如果大脑思维受到了神经技术的干扰（也就是我之前所说的灵魂受到的触碰）根本不能实现佛教冥想（meditation）修炼，也就无法达到佛教的无我（anattā）境地。
佛教轮回转世说将会反对神经技术和人工智能应用于人类意识，也就是神经技术的社会应用。

3.社会管理问题

社会管理问题主张：反民主制度和反人类平等根本特点

对于一个非民主制度授权的人身和思想监控技术，带来的必然是反民主制度和反人类平等；其中反民主制度其核心将是反民主选举制度和立法制度。

       社会管理问题主张：人脑神经技术的不平等性导致无法用于民主社会关系处理，对于机械自动化的应用在神经数据提取和过滤过程中必须受到监管。

社会管理问题主张：关于行为和内心的认知以及社会管理标准

人类自古以来所有的道德、法律、制度均是源自于行为，而且是约束个人和社会行为的。对于人类内心活动的直接表现和监视，计算人脑神经技术首次为人类提供了可能性。在人类社会完全没有准备时，如果将该技术直接应用于社会层面，人类完全没有能力理解什么是内心高尚什么是行为高尚，内心高尚和行为高尚是不是一回事，内心高尚是不是要表现为行为高尚，因此对于人类社会秩序标准是一个很大的冲击和极易导致社会迷茫，最终带来的只有混乱。行为是内心思想的体现，是作用于社会和世界的手段，因此所有的法规制度和道德是约束行为的，不是约束内心的，他们要求内心要通过行为来表现。而对于所谓该技术产生的内心的体现，是要通过该技术的设备作用于世界的，这要看控制权在谁的手里，谁才是行为的主体，那么相关的社会要求是要限制真正的行为主体。

社会管理问题主张：社会管理的基本概念

  反对任何远距离非接触捕获人脑电波技术

  反对无区分无授权解析人脑电波

  反对无区分不匿名无授权传播人脑电波数据

  反对利用人脑电波进行实时沟通

  反对利用人脑电波解析数据进行道德讨论

  反对利用人脑电波进行知识产权侵害

  反对利用人脑电波进行非授权行为代理

  反对利用人脑电波进行人身份替代

  反对利用人脑电波进行隐私窥探和曝光

  反对利用人脑神经技术进行的任何生物进化型改进

  赞同多元文化道德包容

  赞同自由意志

  赞同隐私权和名誉权

  赞同人体器官数据伦理

  赞同非政治化处理人脑伦理问题

  赞同日内瓦人权宣言

  赞同隐形知识产权保护

社会管理问题主张：名誉维护

人脑神经数据滥用造成隐私伤害和污名化时，首先应该将被害人与该技术伤害进行隔离

污名化时神经数据滥用是伤害源头

污名化的扩大化将产生社会伦理道德冲突；严格防治由此产生的政治化

阻止污名化是解决所有谣言的根本

由于过度隐私曝光，当事人后续生存应该考虑重新生成新的现实和网络身份

神经数据滥用时，严格利用神经偏好性刺激制造谣言

当神经数据造成社会谣言并且已经构成了社会威胁，应该进行公正和权威的人身临时监视，以便及时澄清相关谣言，后续及时进行规避神经技术以及掩盖身份式的保护。

神经数据滥用要严格控制神经数据主人的非当面授权的行为代理行为和冒用神经数据主人的名义

神经数据主人责任仅限于其行为

严格控制神经数据的生物性识别和心理行为对比试验

社会管理问题主张：司法

未经过民主制度授权的情况下使用神经技术，将直接导致对于民主制度核心内容选举制度和立法制度的挑战

重视神经技术用于预防犯罪的司法干预的合法性

重视神经技术用于信用领域犯罪的可能性，欺诈、讹诈、煽动、蛊惑。

重视神经技术用于预测个人行为和观点的合法性。

重视神经技术用于预测个人行为和观点的合法性，严格限制政治化；必须以未受刺激前的行为和刺激之后的行为进行综合评定当事人立场。

严格控制神经伦理中的道德争议产生的暴力冲突的可能性，以法制解决为基本准则。

法律是唯一可以量化评估的道德准则。

社会管理问题主张：对于政府管理的挑战

信息的无门槛性公开，将直接挑战政府集中性管理，形成完全无规则的民主，那么将是一种混沌式的无序存在，最终的结果将是在暴力下回归到有限信息公开情况下的有序民主。

社会管理问题主张：神经技术问题引起的法律问题

神经技术所产生的法律问题必须及时予以控制，严防道德矛盾讨论，同时严格依据法律法规规定的程序处理，谨防超越制度，严防在公开曝光条件下的无管制非法的负面失范效应，更要警惕非法被社会默认为合法，最终导致政府公信力丧失和信仰丢失。对于不能及时控制的神经技术问题，隔离去热，普遍受益型和平解决方式是解决其衍生伤害的最理想的方案。

社会管理问题主张：神经技术非法使用在司法领域的罪责确认原则

1）人体大脑受控，其行为不应担负任何刑事民事责任

2）利用神经技术进行预测性控制导致的任何法律责任均应有实施方负责，任何社会功劳均应有被控方获得。

社会管理问题主张：爱国主义和主流文化

人脑神经伦理及类脑人工智能长期失范，导致的道德讨论和道德争议，将直接导致非主流文化消失，主流文化进一步占据统治地位，多样性文化消失，外来文化消失，反国际化情绪增强，排外型爱国主义占据统治地位；必须在强势政府主导下的主流文化支持和保护相关问题的发生。

社会管理问题主张：人脑神经数据传播和意识形态冲突

考虑到个人知识的有限性、认识的偏见性、感情的个性化以及由此产生的对于社会影响的意识形态极端化和对立化，必须禁止人脑神经数据的任意传播编辑和滥用。

社会管理问题主张：人道主义共同认知

人脑数据长时间公开滥用必将由一个人道主义问题，演化成为道德冲突问题，最终导致群体的意识形态冲突问题。人道主义，特别是对儿童的人道主义将成为公开情况下的唯一共识。

社会管理问题主张：神经技术的社会应用原则

应该以改善社会财富不平等（公平发展）为关注焦点，谨慎或严格限制社会管理应用，慎防加重社会关系不平等。严格确认以行为根本的道德约束和法律约束。

社会管理问题主张：关于生物身份识别

在OpenAI等成像技术和GPT-Chat4.0以上智能对话和拟声技术越来越成熟的时候，社会在虚拟社会已经完全无法离开法律有效识别单独个体的生物身份，加之人脑神经数据的滥用，将导致严重的诈骗犯罪问题和因司法的溯及力导致严重的跨国犯罪问题。

社会管理问题主张：婚姻

作为最密切的社会关系和最基本的社会单位组成，人脑神经技术使用将导致违反人类进化的沟通方式和感情交流方式，产生诸多颠覆性缺陷，如不平等、失去尊严、直接伤害、不信任、欺骗、相互监视、非相互需求型的互检表式的管理性婚姻；最终导致人类最密切的社会关系崩溃和社会最基本组成单位的崩溃。

社会管理问题主张：未成年人

由于人脑神经技术问题极易产生复杂的道德问题和道德争论，对于人生观价值观世界观君不成熟的未成年人根本无法应对，极易导致道德偏执和道德迷茫，叛逆行为和道德制高点行为将会非常突出，而且不但会影响自身的社会生存发展也会导致严重的社会不稳定。

社会管理问题主张：性爱

性爱在神经伦理研究中永远是个人隐私问题的最核心问题，必须严格保护和防护伤害。

社会管理问题主张：技术控制权

. 一个没有合同的用神经技术世界即便是你获得了娱乐，也只能说明你被控制了，失去了自由和主动。

社会管理问题主张：对于市场交易价格的影响

从量化经济学的角度解释，神经数据公开或半公开情况下的社会活动中，当神经数据被窃取监控的时候的任何交易，必须考虑自己和对方的相互交易的心理价格。

神经技术进行经济活动，所有的价格必须变成以独立心理因素为基础的加权价格（心理价值）,那么大面积的推广，以国家信用为基础的价格体系是否还能够存在，之后国家信用还是否可靠。

社会管理问题主张：军事应用

除了机械自动化和军事窃密外，人脑神经急速另外一个重大的军事应用是依靠获取人脑神经数据的高强度心理战。对此，除了需要坚定的信仰外，对付这种事情最好的临时办法就是实时激发肾上腺素，保持注意力专注，高节奏的摇滚乐是一个很好的临时应对方式。

社会管理问题主张：技术控制

1)严格限制100HZ人体大脑电磁波及无线电收发设备的使用；

2)一旦发现无线人体大脑神经数据捕获侵权，依据人体大脑脑电波在空气自由耗散最远距离500米，进行半径500米范围内的隔离保护；

3)对无线人体大脑捕获接收机（雷达）的最好查找定位方式，为使用当事人脑电波片段播放干扰进行半径500米内的分格排除查找；

4)采用屏蔽1000HZ电信号和磁信号材料进行被动屏蔽；

5)考虑到电磁 辐射属于神经学常用刺激方式，在2006年国际就已经将此技术进行了神经武器开发，受害期间应对于电磁辐射和离子辐射严格控制，并且防止干预正常使用的谣言存在。

使用神经技术的无制度无区别的泛民主管理在世界上的注定失败
所有的民主都是有制度的，所有的管理包括民主管理都是有级别，任何取消制度和级别的泛民主社会管理注定要失败的；任何文化都是用时间发酵出来的，任何使用文化进行的社会管理都必须尊重历史文化的客观性，希望超越制度管理历史形成的文化尽心所谓的无区别无制度的泛民主社会管理注定要失败的。

Conclusions of relevant neuro AI （NAI） ethics research based on unique and long-term personal victim experience

1. Theoretical basis
   The biggest risk of neurotechnology abuse lies in ideological conflicts, belief intolerance, and the emergence of extreme ideas. Thick black can be regarded as a manifestation of Confucianism under legal control and publicity. The clear provisions in the Constitution of the Communist Party of China that we must prevent the left more than the right, as well as the clear proposal of ideas such as reform and opening up and a harmonious society, reflect the belief tolerance of the basic principles of the Communist Party of China.

Human thinking relies on its own unique historical experience to directly obtain empirical results, and cannot achieve framework and paradigm complete thinking, that is, it cannot process new problems and research work based on human brain neural data, and cannot obtain effective results for complex problems.

Theoretical differences between individual neural computational psychology and group computational neuropsychology based on human brain neural data
The human brain calculates based on experience, and experience is a person’s unique history, so everyone’s human brain computational logic is unique. In other words, we can only have individual computational neuropsychology, and there can be no group computational neuropsychology, which cannot be used for social management.
The theoretical essence of true computational neuropsychology is to reveal the unified relationship between informatics and neurology with quantum theory as the core, and then to explain psychological problems in an essential quantitative way, thus truly establishing group computational neuropsychology. It lays the foundation for social management.

Law is the lowest, most quantifiable and most uncontroversial standard of morality, and it is also the standard for solving neurotechnology problems

The basis of Chinese research on human brain neuroethics and brain-like artificial intelligence ethics

Basic theoretical basis: Constitution + United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Moral theoretical basis: socialist core values

Legal basis: Personal Information Protection Law, Biosafety Law, Science and Technology Progress Law, Reputation Protection, Intellectual Property Protection Law, Radio Control Regulations, Radio Frequency Division Regulations

Respect and revere traditions and culture, do not easily try to subvert and transform, you can only slowly breed new plants like drizzle, until these plants are integrated into the entire forest and form a new look.

Respect and revere traditions and culture, do not easily try to subvert and transform, you can only slowly breed new plants like drizzle, until these plants are integrated into the entire forest and form a new look.

Under high-intensity exposure, it is destined that minority cultures will be swallowed up by mainstream culture unless there is authoritative support from mainstream culture. The best way is for a reasonable minority culture to hide and wait for the storm to pass.

The basis of Chinese brain neuroethical law research:

Basic theoretical basis: Constitution + United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Legal basis: Personal Information Protection Law, Biosafety Law, Science and Technology Progress Law, Reputation Protection, Intellectual Property Protection Law, Radio Control Regulations, Radio Frequency Division Regulations

The way to think about neurotechnology issues

A perfect result must take into account both external variables (environment) and internal variables (event itself). Any incomplete thinking will not be able to achieve this perfect result.

The importance and identification of the brain’s autonomy

The way to influence the brain is to control input and feedback. The input of the human brain mainly relies on hearing and vision, and feedback is the long-term independent thinking of the human brain. If the brain is continuously given uninterrupted input, then the human brain will not have time to feedback, and the behavior dominated by the brain will become larger and larger without feedback. If the continuous input is strategic, then it actually forms a behavioral control of the person. When you can’t think independently for a long time, then you have been controlled. The most important visual and auditory interference, in biology, is essentially to control interference with working memory and strengthen working memory.

About the management of the third dimension in the application of neurotechnology
In our future world, the third dimension is likely to appear, that is, the artificial neural world
Real world
Internet world
Artificial neural world
I personally suggest not to easily connect the three worlds, otherwise the mental hospital will be the best place for the artificial neural world.
So how do we distinguish them?
The real world is a physical world that can be touched and seen
The Internet world is a world that needs the real world to provide credit
The artificial neural world is a world that needs the real world to provide evidence

About the risks of using neurotechnology in the social field
It is difficult to develop communication equipment that completely abandons the human oral language communication method based on human brain neural data. The platform connecting people must be a device that is input through human audition. However, how to grasp the independent thinking of human beings and the filtering of invalid data will be a very difficult problem. At the same time, in terms of social management, there will be problems with third-party platform control (even if it is algorithm control). This situation will fundamentally control human beings’ independent expression of will, complete and rigorous thinking and expression of responsibility.
From an anthropological perspective, abandoning oral language is actually abandoning the result of human evolution. The main result of human evolution is the evolution of the human brain and the evolution of human hands. The plan of the human brain provides the basis for human advanced language, and language is the basis of human communication, and human communication is the basis of human society. In other words, abandoning language communication is equivalent to the evolution of human society. What’s more, it first destroys the closest social communication relationship, the relationship between husband and wife, and the most basic unit of society, the family, and then disintegrates the organizational structure of the existing society. Then, in the process of creating culture with neurotechnology, it will actually lead to the disintegration of human society.
For the problem of social asymmetry and inequality, as well as the deception, dishonesty and managerial slavery caused by it, it is universal and obvious.

Trust cost under neurotechnology
Although the ideal neurotechnology will give the most direct and accurate information transmission to both parties in communication, it loses the moral encapsulation, whether both parties can effectively receive and transmit information, and the most basic selfish component in it. If only one-sided neurotechnology is applied, the best case is the review and supervision of information, and there is no way to establish trust, respect and effective equal communication.

The impact and control of neurotechnology on the market economy
The foundation of the market economy is equal contract mechanism and free choice; therefore, the unequal social relations generated by human brain neural data and the disappearance of choice diversity caused by the full understanding of market consumer demand by neurotechnology-controlled merchants must be restricted. In the end, it will directly lead to the state’s control of national consumption needs, and the efficiency and rationality of the allocation of free choice in the market economy will no longer exist. Instead, it will be replaced by direct national planned allocation, as well as the single national demand and international competition failure that have evolved over a long period of time. In the long run, it is a complete historical regression.

2. Unity of faith
   Human brain neural ethics and brain-like artificial intelligence ethics advocate: Marxism (socialism)
   In socialist countries guided by Marxism, the realization of communism is its ultimate goal, that is, to achieve eternal freedom from exploitation and oppression; the Communist Party Constitution of China recognizes that the highest ideal and ultimate goal of the party is to realize communism, and at the same time, the Chinese Constitution recognizes that all power in the country belongs to the people, that is, everyone must be free and not oppressed. So from this perspective, mind control, such absolute human exploitation and oppression, should be absolutely prohibited. This coincides with the “enjoyment of the blessings of freedom for ourselves and our descendants” in the US Constitution.

Human brain neuroethics and brain-like artificial intelligence ethics: Christianity
Christianity does not oppose people having free will
People’s atonement and inner repentance need to be in front of God (any Christian thought of salvation can only be managed by God)

Human brain neuroethics and brain-like artificial intelligence ethics: Islam
The human soul can only be read under the control of Allah, and only Allah has the right to reward or punish this soul.

Human brain neuroethics and brain-like artificial intelligence ethics: US Constitution and free will
The “enjoyment of the blessings of freedom for ourselves and our descendants” in the US Constitution coincides with this.

Human brain neuroethics and brain-like artificial intelligence ethics: Buddhism
In the original Buddhism, the existence of the soul was not denied, but now Buddhism does not recognize the existence of the soul and the self, and instead uses “no self” to explain it. If the brain thinking is interfered with by neurotechnology (that is, the touch of the soul as I said before), Buddhist meditation cannot be achieved at all, and the Buddhist state of no self (anattā) cannot be achieved.

3. Social management issues
   Social management issues advocate: anti-democratic system and anti-human equality fundamental characteristics
   For a non-democratic system to authorize personal and thought monitoring technology, it will inevitably lead to anti-democratic system and anti-human equality; the core of the anti-democratic system will be anti-democratic election system and legislative system.

Social management issues advocate: The inequality of human brain neural technology makes it impossible to use it for democratic social relationship processing, and the application of mechanical automation must be supervised in the process of neural data extraction and filtering.

Social management issues advocate: about the cognition of behavior and inner heart and social management standards
All human morality, laws, and systems since ancient times are derived from behavior, and they constrain individual and social behavior. For the direct expression and monitoring of human inner activities, computational human brain neural technology has provided humans with the possibility for the first time. When human society is completely unprepared, if this technology is directly applied to the social level, humans will have no ability to understand what is inner nobility and what is behavioral nobility, whether inner nobility and behavioral nobility are the same thing, and whether inner nobility should be expressed as behavioral nobility. Therefore, it is a great shock to the standard of human social order and it is very easy to cause social confusion, and ultimately only chaos. Behavior is the embodiment of inner thoughts and a means of acting on society and the world. Therefore, all laws, regulations and morals are to constrain behavior, not the inner heart. They require the inner heart to be expressed through behavior. As for the inner manifestation produced by the so-called technology, it is to act on the world through the equipment of the technology. This depends on who has the control power and who is the subject of the behavior. Therefore, the relevant social requirement is to restrict the real subject of behavior.

Social management issues advocated: basic concepts of social management
Oppose any long-distance non-contact capture of human brain wave technology
Oppose indiscriminate and unauthorized analysis of human brain waves
Oppose indiscriminate, non-anonymous and unauthorized dissemination of human brain wave data
Oppose the use of human brain waves for real-time communication
Oppose the use of human brain wave analysis data for moral discussion
Oppose the use of human brain waves for intellectual property infringement
Oppose the use of human brain waves for unauthorized behavior agency
Oppose the use of human brain waves for identity substitution
Oppose the use of human brain waves for privacy snooping and exposure
Oppose any biological evolutionary improvement using human brain neural technology
Agree with multicultural moral tolerance
Agree with free will
Agree with privacy and reputation rights
Agree with human organ data ethics
Agree with non-political treatment of human brain ethics issues
Agree with the Geneva Declaration of Human Rights
Agree with invisible intellectual property protection

Social management issues advocate: reputation maintenance
When the abuse of human brain neural data causes privacy damage and stigmatization, the victim should be isolated from the harm of the technology first
When stigmatization occurs, the abuse of neural data is the source of harm
The expansion of stigmatization will produce social ethical conflicts; strictly prevent the resulting politicization
Preventing stigmatization is the fundamental solution to all rumors
Due to excessive privacy exposure, the parties should consider regenerating a new reality and network identity for their subsequent survival
When neural data is abused, strictly use neural preference stimulation to create rumors
When neural data causes social rumors and has posed a social threat, fair and authoritative personal temporary surveillance should be carried out to clarify the relevant rumors in a timely manner, and then promptly circumvent neural technology and cover up identity protection
Abuse of neural data should strictly control the non-face-to-face authorized behavior of the neural data owner, proxy behavior and impersonation of the neural data owner
The liability of the neural data owner is limited to his behavior
Strictly control the biometric identification and psychological behavior comparison test of neural data

Social management issues advocate: Judicial
The use of neural technology without the authorization of the democratic system will directly lead to challenges to the core content of the democratic system, the electoral system and the legislative system
Attach importance to the legitimacy of judicial intervention in the prevention of crime by neural technology
Attach importance to the possibility of using neural technology in the field of credit crimes, fraud, blackmail, incitement, and deception.
Attach importance to the legitimacy of neural technology used to predict personal behavior and opinions.
Attach importance to the legitimacy of neural technology used to predict personal behavior and opinions, and strictly limit politicization; the position of the parties must be comprehensively evaluated based on the behavior before and after stimulation.
Strictly control the possibility of violent conflicts caused by moral disputes in neuroethics, and solve them by law as the basic principle.
Law is the only moral standard that can be quantified and evaluated.

Social management issues advocated: Challenges to government management
The unrestricted disclosure of information will directly challenge the centralized management of the government and form a completely ruleless democracy. It will be a chaotic disorder, and the final result will be a return to an orderly democracy under limited information disclosure under violence.

Social management issues advocated: Legal issues caused by neurotechnology issues
Legal issues arising from neurotechnology must be controlled in a timely manner, and discussions on moral contradictions must be strictly prevented. At the same time, they must be handled strictly in accordance with the procedures prescribed by laws and regulations, and be careful not to exceed the system, and strictly prevent the negative anomie effects of unregulated illegality under public exposure conditions. We must also be wary of illegality being tacitly regarded as legal by society, which will eventually lead to the loss of government credibility and faith. For neurotechnology issues that cannot be controlled in a timely manner, isolation and heat removal, and a universal benefit-based peaceful solution are the most ideal solutions to solve their derivative harms.

Social management issues advocated: The principle of guilt confirmation for illegal use of neurotechnology in the judicial field
1) The human brain is controlled, and its behavior should not bear any criminal or civil liability
2) Any legal liability caused by predictive control using neurotechnology should be borne by the implementer, and any social credit should be obtained by the accused.

Social management issues advocated: Patriotism and mainstream culture
The long-term deviance of human brain neuroethics and brain-like artificial intelligence has led to moral discussions and moral disputes, which will directly lead to the disappearance of non-mainstream culture, the further dominance of mainstream culture, the disappearance of diverse culture, the disappearance of foreign culture, the strengthening of anti-internationalization sentiment, and the dominance of xenophobic patriotism; the mainstream culture under the leadership of a strong government must support and protect the occurrence of related problems.

Social management issues advocated: Human brain neural data dissemination and ideological conflict
Taking into account the limitations of personal knowledge, the bias of cognition, the personalization of emotions, and the resulting ideological extremism and opposition to social influence, the arbitrary dissemination, editing and abuse of human brain neural data must be prohibited.

Social management issues advocated: Humanitarian common cognition
The long-term public abuse of human brain data will inevitably evolve from a humanitarian issue to a moral conflict issue, and ultimately lead to a group of ideological conflicts. Humanitarianism, especially humanitarianism for children, will become the only consensus in public.

Social management issues advocated:

Principles of social application of neurotechnology
The focus should be on improving social wealth inequality (fair development), and social management applications should be cautious or strictly restricted to prevent aggravating social relationship inequality. Strictly confirm the moral and legal constraints based on behavior.

Social management issues advocated: About biometric identification
When imaging technologies such as OpenAI and intelligent dialogue and onomatopoeia technologies such as GPT-Chat4.0 are becoming more and more mature, society in the virtual society is completely unable to effectively identify the biological identity of a single individual without the law. In addition, the abuse of human brain neural data will lead to serious fraud crimes and serious transnational crimes due to judicial retroactivity.

Social management issues advocated: Marriage
As the closest social relationship and the most basic social unit, the use of human brain neural technology will lead to a violation of the communication and emotional exchange methods of human evolution, resulting in many subversive defects, such as inequality, loss of dignity, direct harm, distrust, deception, mutual surveillance, and non-mutual demand-based mutual inspection-style management marriage; ultimately leading to the collapse of the closest social relationship of mankind and the collapse of the most basic social unit.

Social management issues advocated: minors
Because human brain neurotechnology issues are prone to complex moral issues and moral debates, minors with immature outlooks on life, values ​​and the world are simply unable to cope with them, which can easily lead to moral paranoia and moral confusion. Rebellious behavior and moral high ground behavior will be very prominent, and will not only affect their own social survival and development, but also lead to serious social instability.

Social management issues advocated: sex
Sex is always the core issue of personal privacy in neuroethical research, and must be strictly protected and protected from harm.

Social management issues advocated: technical control rights
. In a world without contracts using neurotechnology, even if you get entertainment, it only means that you are controlled and lose your freedom and initiative.

Social management issues advocated: Impact on market transaction prices
From the perspective of quantitative economics, in social activities where neural data is open or semi-open, any transaction when neural data is stolen and monitored must consider the psychological price of mutual transactions between oneself and the other party.
If neurotechnology is used for economic activities, all prices must become weighted prices (psychological values) based on independent psychological factors. If it is widely promoted, can the price system based on national credit still exist? Will national credit still be reliable in the future?

Social management issues advocate: military applications
In addition to mechanical automation and military espionage, another major military application of human brain nerves is high-intensity psychological warfare based on obtaining human brain nerve data. In this regard, in addition to the need for firm belief, the best temporary way to deal with such things is to stimulate adrenaline in real time and keep attention focused. High-tempo rock music is a good temporary response.

Social management issues advocated: technical control
1) Strictly limit the use of 100HZ human brain electromagnetic waves and radio transceiver equipment;
2) Once wireless human brain neural data capture infringement is found, isolation protection within a radius of 500 meters is carried out based on the maximum distance of 500 meters for free dissipation of human brain waves in the air;
3) The best way to find and locate wireless human brain capture receivers (radar) is to use the interference of the party’s brain wave fragment playback to conduct grid exclusion search within a radius of 500 meters;
4) Use shielding materials for 1000HZ electrical and magnetic signals for passive shielding;
5) Considering that electromagnetic radiation is a common stimulation method in neurology, the international community has already developed this technology into a neural weapon in 2006. During the victim period, electromagnetic radiation and ion radiation should be strictly controlled, and rumors of interference with normal use should be prevented.

The pan-democratic management without system and distinction using neural technology is doomed to fail in the world
All democracies have systems, and all management, including democratic management, has levels. Any pan-democratic social management that abolishes systems and levels is doomed to fail; any culture is fermented over time, and any social management using culture must respect the objectivity of historical culture, and the so-called pan-democratic social management without distinction and system that hopes to transcend the culture formed by the history of institutional management is doomed to fail.