张雅楠zeyarna的博客

一个嘴巴上的真理探讨

真理是一直放在那里的道理，也就是一个客观规律，我们探寻真理的方法很多，有实践，有总结，有理论研讨，总归是让我们找到一个我们公信而且能够被实践证明和时间检验的道理，我们称之为科学规律。
那么对于自然科学，我们一般使用利用这种方法的客观现实进行验证，时间短而且是一种看得见摸得着的现实，很容易为人信服。这里有两个问题，当所有人信服的时候，我们就找到了自然科学的客观规律了吗？有时候是这样的，有时候不是这样的，因为科学一直是一个探索未知的过程，是一个需要时间检验的过程，因此自然科学有些时候过了很久才被推翻，只能说我们在探索的过程中寻找到的否定的例子过晚了。那么从相对主义的角度来讲，自然科学规律的发现也是一个不断向自然科学真理无限逼近的过程。这个过程有时快一点有时慢一点，但不可能是一个绝对的真理。比如量子理论的发现，到目前电磁波和声波的粒子化研究是否能够彻底统一将波统一到微观的粒子理论上来。这个是一个科学哲学能否逼近真理的问题。
那么对于社会科学呢？这是一个很要命的问题，因为社会科学是一个很难宏观微观统一的统计量化衡量的问题，也就是说你很难验证的出来，那么社会科学就成为了更加无限逼近真理的冒险求索过程，而且实践的成本很大，乃至在他实践的时候必须所有人一起承担风险，这就是民主制度和民主决策。如果决策错了，大家也就心甘情愿的一起倒霉，要不你就跳出这个民主的圈子。
那么社会科学和自然科学有什么联系呢？社会科学是研究一群人的科学，自然科学包括了研究一个人的科学，叫做生物学和医学。那么我们先来谈谈研究一个人的科学，人为什么能够优于其他生物，数亿年的生存性竞争导致的自然进化，他的两个标志是人脑的生物学结构发展（宏观是脑容量，微观是神经组织的变化，数量、速度以及连接方式），还有一个叫做人手，这个手的进化不但有骨骼的进化、还有肌肉的进化以及末梢神经系统的进化，这个进化使得人类可以优于其他生物使用目前所有的复杂工具，因此我们有了外科医生。
人脑的进化产生了什么呢？我们的匍匐的驱赶无法称重巨大的大脑，因此我们的脊柱必须直立，我们的心脏必须更加发达的运输血液，我们的神经系统必须更加发达的传递我们大脑的信号，因此我的运动结构就低于其他生物了，我们不再能够上树，我们不再能够跳跃，我们不再能够奔跑，但我们有了工具，创造这些工具的东西叫做智慧。
那么我们的智慧哪里来的呢？实践、交流、学习、再实践、在学习。你忽然会问，我们不交流只实践和学习可以吗？bingo，答对了。那是可以的，但是你进化的不够快，这样你的食物会有问题、你的防卫安全会有问题，因为这些都是因为你他妈的进化了以后运动系统不得不退化了导致的。你要了智慧，同时放弃了上窜下跳，这就是你放弃了猴子先进后的代价。好吧，我们不得不说我交流。我怎么交流，“啪的一巴掌，小明你有猴了”，老祖宗说你吃奶的时候吃不着了就知道嘴巴的用处了，那是你一生下来生物进化的结果，这个就是自然科学的研究了。好吧，好吧，我们信奉客观唯物主义，这个我们验证出来了。那么后面呢？交流，就是高效的群体学习，这个你真的躲不了，而且人类之间也是要抢食物生存的，你的小伙伴也是要从敌人嘴里抢肉的，抓紧交流高效学习吧，这样我们就产生了社会交流、社会分工、社会结构、社会文化。唉呀妈呀，我重要找到你了，我的社会科学，一门研究一群人的科学，这么科学最顶层叫做公共管理学就是治理学，老祖宗称为史鉴，当然下面有些叫做文学艺术的东东，那东西一般留的时间长了就是经过检比较安全的东西，自己慢慢看吧。
说远了，拉回来。怎么又去看片了？交流是必须用嘴的对吧，然后说过的话，忘过的事情，那就记下来吧，所以就是文字，文字最早的用途就是抗衰老失忆，当然后面有了文学和历史，那就是集体抗衰老失忆了。那么文字能够代替语言吗？不能，及时性和对于人脑神经需求和表达复杂度需求都不行。那么基于文字的文学和后期的文学创作包括影视都是有问题的。那为啥需要最后的面聊，啥意思？好吧，你是说招聘评估的对人最高效的评估方法，面谈面审面签，那你承不承认是要用嘴巴的？是啊是啊，那么在嘴巴的基础上你用到了眼睛对吗？那么就是嘴巴基础上的视觉神经大脑处理的更高效决策。从这个意义上，我们能不能统一自然科学和社会科学呢？我说能的，社会科学就是基于生物学医学基础上的研究一群人类的生物学和医学，那么就是研究的粒度还太粗了。就像波还没统一到粒子级别一样。
那么我们的社会学跳的出生物学和医学规律吗？不能的。那么生物学告诉我们，我们人类的智慧来自学习之后的自然进化过的大脑，那么我们回答我要超越自然进化的大脑的交流途径，嘴巴，我用神经信号进行对话交流，你觉得呢？我说你他妈去死，你竟然打算超越人类的最基础最原始的优越性，会产生什么？伪科学的人类集体自杀，而且还是在推翻当前民主制度和人类文化基础上的，那你不是反政府反人类是啥？老实点吧，别猴了吧唧的。谁说的算谁的哈。神经技术伏法受控后也等特赦吧，我们建国的时候就特赦了日本战犯和国民党战犯，还和台湾除了国际外交外都可以谈的主席发言，我总觉得我们国家是蛮厚道的，这么大都放了，你也就放宽心别作了，要不就是一群小不辣子打群架。。。守法。。。我躲一边去。

A discussion of the truth in one’s mouth

Truth is a truth that has always been there, that is, an objective law. We have many ways to explore the truth, including practice, summary, and theoretical research. In the end, we find a truth that we believe in and can be proven by practice and tested by time. We call it a scientific law.
Then for natural science, we generally use the objective reality of this method to verify it. The time is short and it is a visible and tangible reality, which is easy to convince people. There are two questions here. When everyone is convinced, have we found the objective law of natural science? Sometimes it is like this, sometimes it is not, because science has always been a process of exploring the unknown and a process that requires time to test. Therefore, natural science is sometimes overturned after a long time. It can only be said that the examples of negation we found in the process of exploration are too late. Then from the perspective of relativism, the discovery of the laws of natural science is also a process of constantly approaching the truth of natural science. This process is sometimes faster and sometimes slower, but it cannot be an absolute truth. For example, the discovery of quantum theory, whether the current research on the particleization of electromagnetic waves and sound waves can completely unify the waves into the microscopic particle theory. This is a question of whether scientific philosophy can approach the truth.
What about social science? This is a very critical question, because social science is a problem of statistical quantification that is difficult to unify at the macro and micro levels, that is, it is difficult to verify it, so social science becomes an adventurous search process that is infinitely close to the truth, and the cost of practice is very high, so much so that when it is practiced, everyone must bear the risk together, which is the democratic system and democratic decision-making. If the decision is wrong, everyone will be willing to suffer together, or you will jump out of this democratic circle.
So what is the connection between social science and natural science? Social science is the science of studying a group of people, and natural science includes the science of studying one person, called biology and medicine. So let’s first talk about the science of studying a person. Why can a person be superior to other creatures? The natural evolution caused by hundreds of millions of years of survival competition has two signs: the development of the biological structure of the human brain (the macroscopic is the brain capacity, and the microscopic is the change of nerve tissue, the number, speed and connection method), and the human hand. The evolution of this hand not only includes the evolution of bones, but also the evolution of muscles and the evolution of the peripheral nervous system. This evolution allows humans to use all the complex tools currently available better than other creatures, so we have surgeons.
What has the evolution of the human brain produced? Our crawling body cannot weigh the huge brain, so our spine must be upright, our heart must be more developed to transport blood, and our nervous system must be more developed to transmit the signals of our brain, so my movement structure is lower than that of other creatures. We can no longer climb trees, we can no longer jump, we can no longer run, but we have tools, and the things that create these tools are called wisdom.
So where does our wisdom come from? Practice, communication, learning, practice again, and learning again. You suddenly ask, can we practice and learn without communication? Bingo, you got it right. That’s fine, but if you don’t evolve fast enough, you will have problems with food and defense, because these are all caused by the fact that your motor system has to degenerate after you evolve. You want wisdom, but at the same time give up jumping up and down. This is the price you pay for giving up the advanced monkeys. Well, we have to talk about communication. How do I communicate? “Slap, Xiao Ming, you have a monkey.” Our ancestors said that when you couldn’t eat milk, you knew the use of your mouth. That was the result of biological evolution when you were born. This is the study of natural science. Well, well, we believe in objective materialism, and we have verified this. So what’s next? Communication is efficient group learning. You really can’t avoid this. Moreover, humans also have to fight for food to survive. Your friends also have to grab meat from the enemy’s mouth. Grasp the communication and learn efficiently. In this way, we have social communication, social division of labor, social structure, and social culture. Oh my god, I finally found you. My social science is a science that studies a group of people. The top level of such science is called public administration, which is governance. Our ancestors called it historical records. Of course, there are some things called literature and art below. Those things are generally kept for a long time and are relatively safe. You can take your time to read them.
I have gone too far, let’s get back to it. Why are you watching movies again? Communication must be done with the mouth, right? Then, write down what you have said and what you have forgotten, so it is text. The earliest use of text is to resist aging and amnesia. Of course, literature and history came later, which is collective anti-aging and amnesia. So can text replace language? No, it is not timely and does not meet the needs of human brain nerves and expression complexity. So literature based on text and later literary creation, including film and television, are problematic. Why do we need a final face-to-face chat? What does it mean? Okay, you mean the most efficient way to evaluate people in recruitment assessment is face-to-face interview, face-to-face review, and face-to-face signing. Do you admit that you need to use your mouth? Yes, yes, then on the basis of the mouth, you use your eyes, right? Then it is the more efficient decision-making of the visual nerve brain based on the mouth. In this sense, can we unify natural science and social science? I say yes, social science is based on the biology and medicine of a group of human beings, so the granularity of the research is still too coarse. Just like the wave has not been unified to the particle level.
Then can our sociology jump out of the laws of biology and medicine? No. Biology tells us that our human wisdom comes from the naturally evolved brain after learning, so we answer that I want to surpass the communication channel of the naturally evolved brain, the mouth, I use nerve signals to communicate, what do you think? I say you fucking die, you actually intend to surpass the most basic and primitive superiority of human beings, what will happen? Pseudo-scientific human collective suicide, and it is based on overthrowing the current democratic system and human culture, then what are you if not anti-government and anti-human? Be honest, don’t be a monkey. Whoever says it is who has the final say. After the neural technology is brought to justice, wait for amnesty. When we founded our country, we pardoned Japanese war criminals and Kuomintang war criminals, and the president made a statement that we can talk to Taiwan except for international diplomacy. I always feel that our country is quite kind. If such a big man is released, you can relax and don’t worry about it. Otherwise, it will be a group of little brats fighting… Obey the law… I will hide away