神经技术在6年围绕本人所构建的众多人参与的神经技术对话和讨论过程中,神经技术广播持续缺乏民主中最基本的自由条件,本人认为为伪民主,其主要表现在:常年在众多人参与的民主活动从未出现以下自由的现象:
1)个人权利正面主张;
2)个人感情正面追逐;
3)个人名誉负责任维护;
4)主动给予支持和保护本人的司法证据;
5)学术认同的个人公开态度;
6)不给予广播者个人行动自由权只给予生命选择自由权,但广播设备长期跟随本人近6年的搬迁生活近300公里;
7)宁肯自杀也不当面寻找本人。

In the process of neurotechnology dialogue and discussion with the participation of many people in the 6 years of neurotechnology construction I have constructed, neurotechnology broadcasting continues to lack the most basic freedom conditions in democracy, and I believe that it is a pseudo-democracy, which is mainly manifested in: The following freedom phenomena have never appeared in democratic activities with the participation of many people all year round:
1) Positive claims of individual rights;
2) positive pursuit of personal feelings;
3) Responsible maintenance of personal reputation;
4) Take the initiative to support and protect my judicial evidence;
5) Personal openness of academic identity;
6) The broadcaster is not given the right to personal freedom of movement, only the right to choose life, but the broadcasting equipment has been following me for nearly 6 years of relocation for nearly 300 kilometers;
7) Would rather commit suicide than look for yourself in person.

留下评论

张雅楠 zeyarna

作为世界首例公开人脑神经技术受害者(2020年至今),目前已经出现了社会局部实验性的管理研究结论;同时针对末日技术的人工智能和神经技术,如何化被动为主动,对己化灾难为机会,对社会化技术压制为技术繁荣,成为我在此开博客的目的。

Let’s connect

文章分类: Article Category