张雅楠zeyarna的博客

一提到做好事情，尤其是普渡众生要做老佛爷的事情，我就来劲；又开始嘚瑟起来了。。。。人家白白眼睛，想死啊你！我还没赚到钱呢，就让我捐钱？来来看看你命值几个子？还敢挑拨社会矛盾，拉出去活埋。。。。。。
我一顿痛哭，冤哪！！！！我一片好心，救人救己。。。。。。故意还是找死。。。。。。别急先听我细细道来。。。。。。说啥，说这个技术的原罪呗。好归好，但是你围着我公开在社会上用了这么久，这点原罪和劣根都给大家看出来了，人家政府好意思让你用啊，人家国际社会不拿人权呼死你啊！
第一大原罪，民主制度的平等自由，一个都保不住。人家的咱家的市场经济基础的契约机制和劳动力自由，啥都得拉倒。。。你叫我咋说你好啊？你就是叫政府闭着眼睛不看我受罪，那这个道理他不能不管吧。。。
第二大原罪，思想意识冲突和信仰不包容。你妈的，我看动画片都能看出个意识冲突，那奶嘴上要不要刻点啥。。。。嘬两口。。。。boss baby管理是罪恶的还是幸福的。。。。。不管了。。。挡奶嘴的事情，连上帝都不容。。。多了我不说，一会儿警察叔叔不乐意了。。。。。
那都这样你咋发展那？人家还没提人权呢？你这个不公平不平等的技术本质即便是经济人工智能自动化应用，也是要受到质疑的，更何况我们还没监管经验。人家闹起来就傻逼，尤其是国外，在弄个啥军事安全威胁，一封就更玩完。那咋拉拢别人呢，说服社会呢？公平发展吧，先考虑考虑弱势群体，脱贫，开荒植树、气候、垃圾啊，还有残疾医疗等，这样社会就容易接受了不是？在这个过程中，大家脾气也不那么暴躁了，哎？别总拿我开刀啊！我们发展的过程中，少点社会矛盾，政府也美滋滋的，实践出真知呗，咋有你点前车之鉴后面再慢慢把监管办法系统弄出来，等到真正大规模商业市场化以后不至于手足无措，还能不落人后，安全发展安全治理。。。。。另外，小声的悄悄告诉你哦，这个公平发展的概念是联合国和天主教基督教提出来的，当然联合国中我们国家做的最好（脱贫一亿），还是很有号召力的。。。。嘻嘻。。。。。胆子大吧。。。。。。跟着道德先锋走吧，少点压力多点朋友，走出去容易些。。。。看看我们人形机器人的发展我们就该明白有些事情是挡不住的。。。。
那现在公司公开搞这个，怎么正名无罪呢？哎呀，我说开公司没人支持嘛。。。。太小瞧人家了嘛！咨询就是出主意嘛！你看我这个主意咋样？。。。。。目前公司正名不是侵权嘬事公司，我预计清扫了四年半国内已经给警方扫荡完了，估计在国外，但你也不能脱离谣言啊！我现在还没开公司，估计以后还是不一定，说不定写完这个哪个兄弟看不开不是把我给撵走了就是给剁了。。。。。好人做到底，先不买关子，买卖不成仁义在嘛！。。。。。说说。。。。。我说。。。。。就是财务审计加信息化审计，然后公开审计结果。。。。。不管我事情了，爱谁折腾谁折腾。。。。。。要是找我嘛，好说好说。。。。。

When it comes to doing good things, especially to save all living beings and do what Buddha does, I get excited; I start to show off again. . . . People are just empty-eyed, you want to die! I haven’t made any money yet, and you want me to donate money? Come and see how much your life is worth? You dare to stir up social contradictions and bury me alive. . . . . .
I cried bitterly, it’s so unfair! ! ! ! I have a good heart, saving others and myself. … The first original sin is that the equality and freedom of the democratic system cannot be preserved. The contract mechanism and labor freedom that are the foundation of our market economy have to be abandoned. . . What can I say to you? You just want the government to close its eyes and not watch me suffer. Then it can’t ignore this principle. . .
The second original sin is the conflict of ideologies and intolerance of beliefs. Damn, I can see the conflict of ideologies when watching cartoons. Should something be engraved on the pacifier? . . . Take a few sips. . . . Is boss baby management a sin or happiness? . . . . . Never mind. . . Even God cannot tolerate blocking the pacifier. . . . I won’t say more. The police uncle will be unhappy soon. . . . .
How can you develop like this? People haven’t even mentioned human rights? The unfair and unequal nature of your technology will be questioned even if it is an application of economic artificial intelligence automation, not to mention that we have no regulatory experience. When people start to make trouble, they are stupid, especially those abroad. If they make some military security threats, one letter will be enough. So how to win over others and convince the society? Let’s develop fairly. First consider the disadvantaged groups, get rid of poverty, reclaim land and plant trees, climate, garbage, and medical care for the disabled, so that the society will be more receptive, right? In this process, everyone’s temper will not be so bad, eh? Don’t always blame me! In the process of our development, if there are fewer social contradictions, the government will also be happy. Practice makes perfect. How can you learn from the past and then slowly come up with a system of regulatory measures, so that you will not be at a loss when the real large-scale commercial market is launched, and you can keep up with others, and develop safely and govern safely. . . . . In addition, I’ll tell you quietly that the concept of fair development was proposed by the United Nations and Catholic Christianity. Of course, our country has done the best in the United Nations (lifting 100 million people out of poverty), and it is still very appealing. . . . Hehe. … Let’s follow the moral pioneers, less pressure and more friends, it’s easier to go out. . . . Look at the development of our humanoid robots and we should understand that some things can’t be stopped. . . .
Then how can the company be cleared of guilt if it is openly doing this now? Oh, I said that no one supports opening a company. . . . You underestimate others! Consulting is to give advice! What do you think of my idea? . . . . . At present, the company is not an infringement and trouble-making company. I estimate that the police have swept it up in China after four and a half years of cleaning. It is estimated that it is abroad, but you can’t get rid of rumors! I haven’t started a company yet, and it may not be certain in the future. Maybe after writing this, some brother will not be able to see it and either drive me away or chop me up. . . . . Be a good person to the end, don’t buy suspense first, even if the deal doesn’t work out, there is still righteousness! . . . . . . Talk about it. . . . . . I said. . . . . . It’s just financial audit plus information-based audit, and then the audit results will be made public. . . . . It’s none of my business, whoever wants to do it can do it. . . . . . If you come to me, I’ll talk to you. . . . .